Does the CBA have provisions related to the use of body-worn cameras or body-worn camera video evidence?
Topic: Evidence and records
CBAs marked "Yes" address a given topic or question or "No" do not address that topic or question. Or there is no CBA, the CBA is unknown, or a FOIA request was denied.
| District | Answer |
|---|---|
| Alaska | NO |
| Anchorage, AK | NO |
| Alabama | NO CBA |
| Birmingham, AL | NO CBA |
| Arkansas | NO CBA |
| Arizona | NO CBA |
| Chandler, AZ | NO |
| Gilbert, AZ | NO CBA |
| Glendale, AZ | YES |
| Summary: Officers are allowed to view camera footage before an interview. The CBA also describes the access to camera footage and requires officers to be notified before releasing footage. | |
| Mesa, AZ | NO CBA |
| Phoenix, AZ | YES |
| Summary: States that officers are allowed to see camera footage before an interrogation. | |
| Scottsdale, AZ | NO CBA |
| Tucson, AZ | NO |
| California | NO |
| Anaheim, CA | NO |
| Bakersfield, CA | NO |
| Chula Vista, CA | NO |
| Fremont, CA | NO |
| Fresno, CA | NO |
| Irvine, CA | NO |
| Long Beach, CA | NO |
| Los Angeles, CA | NO |
| Oakland, CA | NO |
| Riverside, CA | NO |
| Sacramento, CA | NO |
| San Bernardino, CA | NO |
| San Diego, CA | NO |
| San Francisco, CA | NO |
| San Jose, CA | YES |
| Summary: The CBA covers the administrative review and auditing policies of body-worn cameras. | |
| Santa Ana, CA | NO |
| Stockton, CA | NO |
| Colorado | NO CBA |
| Aurora, CO | NO |
| Colorado Springs, CO | NO CBA |
| Denver, CO | NO |
| Connecticut | NO |
| District of Columbia | NO |
| Delaware | FOIA DENIED |
| Florida | NO |
| Hialeah, FL | NO |
| Jacksonville, FL | NO |
| Miami, FL | NO |
| Orlando, FL | NO |
| St. Petersburg, FL | NO |
| Tampa, FL | NO |
| Georgia | NO CBA |
| Atlanta, GA | NO CBA |
| Hawaii | NO |
| Honolulu, HI | NO |
| Iowa | NO |
| Idaho | NO CBA |
| Boise, ID | NO |
| Illinois | NO |
| Chicago, IL | NO |
| Indiana | NO CBA |
| Fort Wayne, IN | NO |
| Indianapolis, IN | YES |
| Summary: There is a safety advisory committee that also covers body-worn cameras. | |
| Kansas | YES |
| Summary: The superintendent can instruct an employee to use a camera in order to observe criminal, unconstitutional, or unsafe behavior. | |
| Wichita, KS | NO |
| Kentucky | NO CBA |
| Lexington, KY | NO |
| Louisville, KY | NO |
| Louisiana | NO CBA |
| Baton Rouge, LA | NO |
| New Orleans, LA | NO CBA |
| Massachusetts | NO |
| Boston, MA | YES |
| Summary: Either party of the CBA can request to review the terms, expand, or cease to use body-worn cameras. | |
| Maryland | NO |
| Baltimore, MD | NO |
| Maine | NO |
| Michigan | NO |
| Detroit, MI | NO |
| Minnesota | NO |
| Minneapolis, MN | NO |
| St. Paul, MN | NO |
| Missouri | NO CBA |
| Kansas City, MO | NO |
| St. Louis, MO | NO |
| Mississippi | NO CBA |
| Montana | NO |
| North Carolina | NO CBA |
| Charlotte, NC | NO CBA |
| Durham, NC | NO CBA |
| Greensboro, NC | NO CBA |
| Raleigh, NC | NO CBA |
| Winston-Salem, NC | NO CBA |
| North Dakota | NO CBA |
| Nebraska | YES |
| Summary: Officers are given access to camera footage when under investigation | |
| Lincoln, NE | NO |
| Omaha, NE | NO |
| New Hampshire | NO |
| New Jersey | NO |
| Jersey City, NJ | NO |
| Newark, NJ | NO |
| New Mexico | NO CBA |
| Albuquerque, NM | NO |
| Nevada | NO |
| Henderson, NV | NO |
| Las Vegas, NV | YES |
| Summary: Uniformed officers are required to wear body-worn cameras. | |
| North Las Vegas, NV | NO |
| Reno, NV | NO |
| New York | NO |
| Buffalo, NY | UNKNOWN |
| New York, NY | NO |
| Ohio | YES |
| Summary: Describes disciplinary action involving footage | |
| Cincinnati, OH | NO |
| Cleveland, OH | NO |
| Columbus, OH | YES |
| Summary: This CBA covers misconduct, public records requests, procedures and protections related to the use of body-worn cameras or body-worn camera video evidence. | |
| Toledo, OH | NO |
| Oklahoma | NO CBA |
| Oklahoma City, OK | NO |
| Tulsa, OK | NO |
| Oregon | NO |
| Portland, OR | NO |
| Pennsylvania | NO |
| Philadelphia, PA | NO |
| Pittsburgh, PA | YES |
| Summary: CBA requires the use of body-worn cameras. | |
| Rhode Island | YES |
| Summary: There is a $3000 stipend from the state for implementing body cameras. | |
| South Carolina | NO CBA |
| South Dakota | NO CBA |
| Tennessee | NO CBA |
| Memphis, TN | NO |
| Nashville, TN | NO |
| Texas | NO CBA |
| Arlington, TX | NO CBA |
| Austin, TX | NO |
| Corpus Christi, TX | NO |
| Dallas, TX | NO |
| El Paso, TX | NO |
| Fort Worth, TX | NO |
| Garland, TX | NO CBA |
| Houston, TX | YES |
| Summary: Mentions a Body Worn Camera Committee(s); states that officers are provided footage before investigation. | |
| Irving, TX | NO CBA |
| Laredo, TX | NO |
| Lubbock, TX | NO CBA |
| Plano, TX | NO CBA |
| San Antonio, TX | NO |
| Utah | NO CBA |
| Virginia | NO CBA |
| Chesapeake, VA | FOIA DENIED |
| Norfolk, VA | NO CBA |
| Richmond, VA | NO CBA |
| Virginia Beach, VA | NO CBA |
| Vermont | NO |
| Washington | NO |
| Seattle, WA | NO |
| Wisconsin | NO |
| Madison, WI | NO |
| Milwaukee, WI | YES |
| Summary: States that officers are allowed to see camera footage before an interrogation. | |
| West Virginia | UNKNOWN |
| Wyoming | NO CBA |