Does the CBA determine a timeline for investigations?
Topic: Investigations
CBAs marked "Yes" address a given topic or question or "No" do not address that topic or question. Or there is no CBA, the CBA is unknown, or a FOIA request was denied.
| District | Answer |
|---|---|
| Alaska | NO |
| Anchorage, AK | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 45 days | |
| Alabama | NO CBA |
| Birmingham, AL | NO CBA |
| Arkansas | NO CBA |
| Arizona | NO CBA |
| Chandler, AZ | NO |
| Gilbert, AZ | NO CBA |
| Glendale, AZ | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 120 days | |
| Detail: Investigations must be completed within 120 days measuring from the day the officer is given notice of the investigation to when the officer is served with a final finding or notice of intent to discipline. If an investigation lasts longer than 120 days, the officer and unions must receive an update on the status of the investigation and a projected timeline to completion. Such an update must be given every 30 days. | |
| Mesa, AZ | NO CBA |
| Phoenix, AZ | NO |
| Scottsdale, AZ | NO CBA |
| Tucson, AZ | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days for administrative violations, one 30 day extension allowed | |
| California | NO |
| Anaheim, CA | NO |
| Bakersfield, CA | NO |
| Chula Vista, CA | NO |
| Fremont, CA | NO |
| Fresno, CA | NO |
| Irvine, CA | NO |
| Long Beach, CA | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days | |
| Los Angeles, CA | NO |
| Oakland, CA | NO |
| Riverside, CA | NO |
| Sacramento, CA | NO |
| San Bernardino, CA | NO |
| San Diego, CA | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 1 year | |
| San Francisco, CA | NO |
| San Jose, CA | NO |
| Santa Ana, CA | NO |
| Stockton, CA | NO |
| Colorado | NO CBA |
| Aurora, CO | NO |
| Colorado Springs, CO | NO CBA |
| Denver, CO | NO |
| Connecticut | NO |
| District of Columbia | NO |
| Delaware | FOIA DENIED |
| Florida | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 45 days | |
| Hialeah, FL | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 60 days | |
| Jacksonville, FL | NO |
| Miami, FL | NO |
| Orlando, FL | NO |
| St. Petersburg, FL | NO |
| Tampa, FL | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days | |
| Georgia | NO CBA |
| Atlanta, GA | NO CBA |
| Hawaii | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 1 year | |
| Honolulu, HI | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 1 year | |
| Iowa | NO |
| Idaho | NO CBA |
| Boise, ID | NO |
| Illinois | NO |
| Chicago, IL | NO |
| Indiana | NO CBA |
| Fort Wayne, IN | NO |
| Indianapolis, IN | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 60 days after incident or 30 days after investigation | |
| Kansas | NO |
| Wichita, KS | NO |
| Kentucky | NO CBA |
| Lexington, KY | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 60 days, but may request 60 day extensions. | |
| Louisville, KY | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days, an additional 180 days requested | |
| Louisiana | NO CBA |
| Baton Rouge, LA | NO |
| New Orleans, LA | NO CBA |
| Massachusetts | NO |
| Boston, MA | NO |
| Maryland | NO |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: 15 days to discuss with employee, union representative, and immediate supervisor; Timeline to conclude: N/A | |
| Baltimore, MD | NO |
| Maine | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: Member must be given notice of the final outcome within 15 days. | |
| Michigan | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: 30 days if involving suspension, dismissals or discharges; Timeline to conclude: 30 days to finalize in writing | |
| Detroit, MI | NO |
| Minnesota | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: Less than 21 days; Timeline to conclude: N/A | |
| Minneapolis, MN | NO |
| St. Paul, MN | NO |
| Missouri | NO CBA |
| Kansas City, MO | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: Disciplinary coordinator has 5 days to review and conclude investigation. | |
| St. Louis, MO | NO |
| Mississippi | NO CBA |
| Montana | NO |
| North Carolina | NO CBA |
| Charlotte, NC | NO CBA |
| Durham, NC | NO CBA |
| Greensboro, NC | NO CBA |
| Raleigh, NC | NO CBA |
| Winston-Salem, NC | NO CBA |
| North Dakota | NO CBA |
| Nebraska | NO |
| Lincoln, NE | NO |
| Omaha, NE | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 100 days | |
| New Hampshire | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 90 days, but can request 30 day extension | |
| New Jersey | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: Charges must be brought within 45 days; Timeline to conclude: N/A | |
| Jersey City, NJ | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: Written reprimands must be served within 5 days of the incident | |
| Newark, NJ | NO |
| New Mexico | NO CBA |
| Albuquerque, NM | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 120 days | |
| Nevada | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 90 days, but can request 60 day extension | |
| Henderson, NV | NO |
| Las Vegas, NV | NO |
| North Las Vegas, NV | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: 90 days; Timeline to conclude: N/A | |
| Reno, NV | NO |
| New York | NO |
| Buffalo, NY | UNKNOWN |
| New York, NY | NO |
| Ohio | NO |
| Cincinnati, OH | NO |
| Cleveland, OH | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 1 year | |
| Columbus, OH | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 50 days | |
| Toledo, OH | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 45 days for minor violations, 100 days for major violations | |
| Oklahoma | NO CBA |
| Oklahoma City, OK | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: Written notice must be provided every 90 days if not completed. | |
| Tulsa, OK | NO |
| Oregon | NO |
| Portland, OR | NO |
| Pennsylvania | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 120 days, 90 days for criminal charges | |
| Philadelphia, PA | NO |
| Pittsburgh, PA | NO |
| Rhode Island | NO |
| South Carolina | NO CBA |
| South Dakota | NO CBA |
| Tennessee | NO CBA |
| Memphis, TN | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 1 year after investigation begins. | |
| Nashville, TN | NO |
| Texas | NO CBA |
| Arlington, TX | NO CBA |
| Austin, TX | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 365 days to discipline for injury to the public or citizen | |
| Corpus Christi, TX | NO |
| Dallas, TX | NO |
| El Paso, TX | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days for disciplinary action | |
| Fort Worth, TX | NO |
| Garland, TX | NO CBA |
| Houston, TX | NO |
| Irving, TX | NO CBA |
| Laredo, TX | NO |
| Lubbock, TX | NO CBA |
| Plano, TX | NO CBA |
| San Antonio, TX | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 21 days for minor misconduct, 180 days for other disciplinary proceedings | |
| Utah | NO CBA |
| Virginia | NO CBA |
| Chesapeake, VA | NO CBA |
| Norfolk, VA | NO CBA |
| Richmond, VA | NO CBA |
| Virginia Beach, VA | NO CBA |
| Vermont | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 30 days for non-criminal internal investigations | |
| Washington | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 45 days for minor complaints, 90 days for moderate complaints, and 120 days for major complaints | |
| Seattle, WA | YES |
| Summary: Timeline to launch: N/A; Timeline to conclude: 180 days, can be extended for 60 days | |
| Wisconsin | NO |
| Madison, WI | NO |
| Milwaukee, WI | NO |
| West Virginia | UNKNOWN |
| Wyoming | NO CBA |